Samsung Galaxy S Advance vs XOLO X900

In this post I will compare Samsung Galaxy S Advance vs XOLO X900, two exciting new phone with lots of features and promise as well. Samsung Galaxy S Advance comes from the big house of Samsung; buyers show confidence in purchasing the product. On the other hand, XOLO is a new brand(X900 was primarily launched as Lava XOLO X900 now only XOLO X900 in India and Orange San Diego in UK) originally manufactured by Gigabyte and brought to market by Intel is yet to make any mark in market. XOLO X900 is fueled by Intel AZ210 Atom processor which is the first mobile processor from Intel. On the other hand, Samsung went safely with already proven dual core Cortex A9 CPU and STE8500 chipset.

Both droid are currently running with Android 2.3 Gingerbread; X900 is upgradable to Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich but Samsung is yet to release upgrade to Galaxy S Advance. XOLO X900 has better camera, better video recording and more RAM. Rest of the features are almost similar and you have no room for complaint. Let’s take a look at Samsung Galaxy S Advance vs XOLO X900 comparison table-

	Samsung Galaxy S Advance	XOLO X900	Winner of the round
Price	Rs. 22,900/-	Rs. 22,000/-	X900
Operating System	Android 2.3 Gingerbread	Android 2.3 Gingerbread	Tied
Processor & GPU	1 GHz dual core Cortex A9 and Mali 400-Mp GPU	1.6 GHz Intel Z2460 Mobile Processor with Hyper Threading and 400 MHz GPU	Galaxy S Advance
Dimension	123.2 x 63 x 9.7 mm	123 x 63 x 10.99 mm	Galaxy S Advance
Form Factor	Bar, full touch screen	Bar, full touch screen	Tied
Weight	120 gm	124 gm	Galaxy S Advance
Display Type	AMOLED Capacitive touchscreen,233 ppi	TFT LCD, 246 ppi	Galaxy S Advance
Display Size	4.0 inches	4.03 inches	Tied
Sensors	Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Digital Compass	Accelerometer,proximity,ambient light,magnetometer	Tied
Additional Display Technology	Samsung TouchWiz UI	N/A	Galaxy S Advance
RAM	768 MB	1 GB	X900
Internal Memory	16 GB	16 GB	Tied
Micro SD card slot	Yes, expandable up to 32 GB	Yes, expandable up to 32 GB	Tied
Primary Camera	5 MP	8 MP	X900
Features	auto focus, LED flash,Digital Zoom,Geo-tagging, Image Stabilizationn	auto focus, LED flash,Digital Zoom,Geo-tagging, Image Stabilization	X900
Video recording	Yes,HD 720p	Yes, HD 1080p	X900
Secondary Camera	1.3 MP	1.3 MP	Tied
Music Player	Yes	Yes	Tied
Supported Formats	MP3/WAV/eAAC+/AC3/FLAC	MP3/WAV/eAAC+/AC3/FLAC	Tied
Video Player	Yes	Yes	Tied
Supported Formats	MP4/DivX/WMV/H.264/H.263	MPEG4, 3GPP, WMC, H.264, VP8	Galaxy S Advance
FM radio	Yes, Stereo FM radio with RDS	No	Galaxy S Advance
GSM Network	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	No Comparison
3G Network	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100	UMTS/HSPA: 850/900/1900/2100	No Comparison
4G Network	No	No	Tied
GPRS/EDGE	Yes, Class 12, EDGE speed up to 237 Kbps	Yes, Class 12, GPRS Up to 86 kbps and EDGE up to 237 Kbps	Tied
Speed	HSDPA up to 14.4 Mbps, HSUPA up to 5.76 Mbps	HSDPA up to 21 Mbps, HSUPA up to 5.76 Mbps	X900
Bluetooth	Yes, v3.0 with A2DP,HS	Yes, v2.1 with A2DP, EDR	Galaxy S Advance
Wi-Fi	Yes, Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n,Wi-Fi hotspot,Wi-Fi Direct	Yes, Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n,Wi-Fi hotspot,Wi-Fi Direct	Tied
NFC	No	Yes	X900
USB	Yes v2.0	Yes v2.0	Tied
GPS Navigation	A-GPS support	A-GPS support	Tied
Java Support	Yes via MIDP emulator v2.1	Yes via MIDP Emulator v2.1	Tied
Colors	Black,White	Black	No Comparison
Browser	HTML,xHTML,Adobe Flash	HTML,xHTML,Adobe Flash	Tied
Battery	1500 mAh Li-Ion	1450 mAh Li-Ion	Galaxy S Advance

Final Conclusion

Well, you can see from the comparison table that both these droids are pretty close to each other. Samsung Galaxy S Advance is fueled by dual core processor(separate GPU unit as well) whereas X900 is powered by Intel ATOM single core mobile processor and 400 MHz GPU unit. For gamers I must say Galaxy S Advance is better option. But in overall comparison XOLO X900 is better. It has better camera, better video recording quality. There is not much of difference in price between the duos. So, my bet will be XOLO X900.

Samsung Galaxy S Advance vs XOLO X900